Court admits FBI report claiming Mompha used iPhone for ‘N6bn fraud’


An Ikeja Special Offences Court, Lagos, has admitted more
documents in evidence against Ismaila Mustapha, the socialite better known as


Mompha alongside Ismalob Global Investment Limited, his
company, are facing an eight-count charge of conspiracy to launder funds
obtained through unlawful activity, retention of proceeds of criminal conduct,
laundering of funds obtained through unlawful activity, failure to disclose
assets and property, possession of documents containing false pretence and use
of property derived from an unlawful act.


At the resumed hearing in the matter, yesterday, the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, through its counsel, Suleiman
Suleiman, presented two documents, including a letter by the commission to the
United States of America’s Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI, and an
investigative report by the bureau.


The investigative report claimed Mompha’s iPhone was used
for fraudulent practices.


The prosecution witness, Ayotunde Solademi, an FBI
representative, said the bureau’s forensic operations revealed that Mompha’s
iPhone was used to send account details to a United Arab Emirates, UAE,
telephone number, search for swift codes of a bank, and had a compromised
Microsoft 365 account.


The witness said: “The iPhone had a compromised Microsoft
365 account and attackers used a fraudulent domain to socially engineer
communication to their (Mompha’s) company.”


He further told the court that the FBI discovered during
analysis that Mompha’s iPhone was also used to change payment delivery from
cheque to wire transfer.


“The iPhone was used to make three attempts to transfer
funds. The first two failed, but the third was successful,” he added.


Under cross-examination, Kolawole Salami, counsel to Mompha,
read from a paragraph of the documents which stated that the FBI documents were
not to be used in a legal proceeding except after a separate communication has
been made.


Responding, the witness said his presence in court to give
evidence amounted to a separate communication from the FBI that allowed for the
use of the documents in court.


The witness also admitted that he was not aware whether the
FBI ever arrested the defendant, added that the FBI forensic analysis of
Mompha’s iPhone was commissioned at the request of the EFCC.


Earlier, Mompha’s counsel had objected to the admissibility
of the documents in evidence, arguing that they must first be certified by the
United States Consulate.


“The documents are not certified true copies, and should not
be admitted in court,” Salami had said.

However, the judge overruled the objection and upheld the
arguments of the prosecution, who maintained that the FBI documents were


“The documents do not require certification,” the judge


Related posts

Start Chat
Chat With DJ Gambit
How Can I help You?
%d bloggers like this: